Effect of Plant Spacing Density and Inter Cropping on the Growth and Wilt Disease of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill), Owerri Metropolis, Imo State, Nigeria
E. M. Nwokeji *
Department of Crop Science and Technology, School of Agriculture and Agricultural Technology, Federal University of Tecchnology Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria.
C. M. Agu
Department of Crop Science and Technology, School of Agriculture and Agricultural Technology, Federal University of Tecchnology Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria.
G. O. Ihejirika
Department of Crop Science and Technology, School of Agriculture and Agricultural Technology, Federal University of Tecchnology Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria.
C. Peter-Onoh
Department of Crop Science and Technology, School of Agriculture and Agricultural Technology, Federal University of Tecchnology Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria.
V. E. Ogwudire
Department of Crop Science and Technology, School of Agriculture and Agricultural Technology, Federal University of Tecchnology Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria.
S. E. Okere
Department of Crop Science and Technology, School of Agriculture and Agricultural Technology, Federal University of Tecchnology Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This present study was undertaken to assess the effect of plant spacing density and intercropping on the wilt disease of tomato in the year 2015. The study was designed as a 4x4 factorial in Randomized Complete Block Design with four (4) replications. Data on growth parameters and disease incidence on tomato were collected and statistically analyzed by using Genstat version 4 analytical software, while the means were separated for difference using Fisher`s Least Significant Difference Protocol. Spacing significantly (P<0.05) affected the percentage wilt disease incidence in the 8 weeks of transplanting. However intercropping and spacing had no significant (P>0.05) effect in both plant height and number of leaves of tomato. From the study, the lowest plant spacing of 50 x 25, under the crop combination of tomato, groundnut and soybean, increased the tomato wilt to the highest (113.67%). Dense tomato plant population should, therefore, not to be encouraged in mitigating the tomato wilt. On the other hand, sole tomato, with distance of 100 x 75cm, should be given consideration in managing tomato wilt, as it led to the list disease incidence in the last week of the study when the infection got to the climax.
Keywords: Plant spacing, intercropping, growth, wilt disease, tomato
How to Cite
Downloads
References
Gould WA. Tomato Production, Processing and Quality Evaluation, 2nd Editon. AVI Publishing Comp., Westport, Connectticut. 1983;34-45.
Arat N, Bashar M, Begeum, Kakon S. Effect of spacing and stem pruning on the growth and yield of tomato0. International Journal of Sustainable Crop Production. 2007;2(3):3539.
Michael, Agam. Agronomy Information on Tomatoes and pest and Control Measures for Tomatoes, Tuta Absoluta; 2016.
Amati M, Detter E, Lingen TV, Pinners E, Ram SCA. How to Grow Tomato and Peppers. 1989;6-60.
Jones Jr JB. Tomato Plant Culture: In the Field, Greenhouse, and Home Gardeen. CRC Press.Boca Raton, FL.USA; 2007.
Kelley WT, Boyhan G. Commercial tomato production hand book, The University of Georgia a USA,2010nd Ft, Valley State University, Fort Valley, GA. USA; 2010.
Muhammad A, Singh A. In-ntra row spacing and pruning effects on fresh tomato yield in Sudan Savanna of Nigeria, Journal of plant Sciences. 2007;2(2):153-161.
Raseduzzaman M, Jensen ES. Does intercropping enhance yield stability in arable crop production? A meta-analysis, Eur. J. Agronomy. 2017;91:25-33.
Mark A Boudreau. Diseases in Intercropping. In Annual Review of Phy to Pathology. 2013;51:499–519.
Ravneet K, Sandhu Nathan S, Boyd Lincoln Zotarelli, Shinsuke Agehara, Natalia Peres. Effect or planting density on the yield and growth of int. Ercropped Tomatoes and Peppers in Florida in Hort. Science. 2021;56(2):5.
Aticle Category: Research Article . Online Publication Date: 15th, Jan, 2021. Open access
DOI: https: // doi. org/10. 21273/HORTSCI1556720
Fortin MC, Cullery J, Edwards E.M. Soil Water, Plant growth, and yield of strip inter croppeg corn. J. Prod. Agr. 76369. Search Google Scholar. Export Citation; 1994.
Gebru H. A review on the comparative advantage of inter copping system. J. Biol. Agric. Health. 2015;5(28):38. Search Google Scholar. Export Citation.
Palti J. Cultural Practices and Infectious Crop Diseases. Speinger, Berlin. 1980;243.
Ukwu LG, Nwokwu GN, Chiagor EO. Effect of time of mulching and plant spacing on the growth and yield of okra A. esc. L. in Abakaliki. Int. J. of Agric. and Rural Dev. 2010;13:259-260.
Jereanyama P, Hesterman OB, Wedding SR, Harwood RR. Relaying Intercropping of sunhemp and cowpea into a small holder maize system in Zimbabwe. Agron. Journ. 2002;92:239–244.
Altieri MA. Biodiversity and Pest Management in Agro-ecosystems. Food Products Press, New York; 1994.
Andrews DT. Intercropping with Sorgum, Samaru Rer earch Bulletin. 1975;238.
Okigbo BN. Cropping Systems and related Research in Africa. 10th Anniversiry of S.A. accessional Publications series, O.T.I. 1978;1978.
Walters RF. Shifting cultivation in Latin America, F.A.O. Forestry Development Papers, No. 17. Rome. 1971;37-39.
Agboola AA. Farming Systems in Nigeria. In Land development and management of acidic soils in Africa. Proceedings of the Second Regional Workshop on Land development and management of Acid Soils in Africa. Lusaka and Kassama. 1987,1978;67-81.
Sterner KG. Intercropping in Tropical Small Holder Agriculture with Special Reference to West Africa, 2nd Ed. GTZ. Eschborn. W. Germany. 1984;304.
Harry GT, Ohanuna MO. Evaluation of the performance of yam minisett intercropped with maize in the River State. Paper presented at the 4th Annual farming system Research and Extension Workshop in south eastern Nigeria. Umudike; 1990.
FDALR (Federal Department of Agriculture and Land Resources). The Reconnaissance Survey of Imo State Soil Report. 1985;133.
Wahua TT. Applied Statistics for Scientific Studies. 1999;347.
Hussen S, Kemal M, Wasie M. Effect of intra-row spacing on growth and development of tomato (Lycopersicom esculentum Mil) var. Roma VF. at the experimental site of Wollo, Ethiopia, International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBARD). 2013; 10(1):19-24.
Ogundare SK, Oloniruha JA, Ayodele FG, Bello IA. Effect of different spacing and urea application rates on fruit nutrient composition, growth and yield of tomato in derived Savannah vegetation; 2015.
Ononiwu N. The physic-chemical properties of soils and associated properties of soils and associated cropping Land use systems in Eziobo village, Owerri L.G.A, Nigeria. B, Agri. Tech. Project. Sch. of Agric. and Agric. Tech. (SAAT). Fed. Univ. of Tech. Owerri; 1990.
Webster CC. Tropical and Subtropical soils. Soil Science Department, Cambridge University. 1969;360.
Ohiri AC. Soil and fertilizer use on maize in south eastern states of Nigeria. An update proceedings, 3rd National Fertilizer Workshop, Ibadan April 22-24. of Kogi State, Nigeria. American journal of Plant Sciences. 2015,1992;6(14):2227. View at: Publisher Site/ Google Scholar.
Semchenko M, Hutchings MJ, John EA. Challenging the tragedy of the commons in root competition: Confounding effects of neighour presence and substrate volume. J. Ecol. 2007;95:252-260.
Antonovics J, Levin DA. The Ecological and genetic consequences of density – dependent regulation in plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1982;11:411-452.
Van Rheenan HA, Hassel Bach OE, Muigai SGS. The effects of growing beans together with maize on the incidence of bean disease and pests. Neth. J. Plant Pathology. 1981;87:193-199.
Ofuya TI. Observation on insect infestation and damage in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) intercropped with tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) in rain forest areas of Nigeria. Exp. Agric. 1991;27:407-412.
Davis JHC, Wooly JN. Genotypic requirements for intercropping. Field Crop Res. 1993;34:407-430.
Nat’l Acad. of Science.Recommended Dietary Allowances, 7th edition. Food Nutri. Board Publ. 1694. Acad. Sci. Washington, D.C; 1968.